I am not Spock

Really! I know I have odd ears, dark flat hair, and am tall and glum, but I ain't even a Trekkie! I'm just a shmoe who likes to Digitally Restore old recordings of anything [no "DCC"s or 8-tracks] sent to me as a CDR copy. This blog is less about selling a service and more about showing music-lovers ways to get the most music out of those dusty ol' discs! But many folk lack the resources to do this, so I'll do it for 'em [and for cheap]! This blog's unfinished so there's nothing here yet...

Monday, November 12, 2012

Back with a trike review!


Hiya all! I'm back in to relate my experience with the Sun EZ3 Tri-Classic Recumbent Trike, a sweet 3-wheeled recumbent bike I recently got. It's got 21 speeds weighted towards ease of climbing hills, not so much for speed which is fortunate because this trike gets jittery IOW narrow rear wheelspan causes lateral rocking, and the small front wheel causes shaky steering when the speed gets much above 15 miles per hour. So a commuting bike [trike] this most assuredly is not. But it is still a fun bike to ride if one wants some wind-in-the-hair outdoor exercise, which is why I bought mine, after a recent deer-versus-bike accident I had while riding my Giant Suede GX [wrecked in the accident], which also wrecked me but good, it almost killed me!. My poor bod was a solid mass of contusions, hematomas and deep bruises, my right arm was ground down to the bone while my left arm was shattered and required pins and plates/open reduction of compound fracture. NOT FUN!

The Giant Suede got wobbly when i tried to avoid the deer which ran into me, which is what caused me to get knocked off the bike head-over-handlebars, SPLAT! hard onto the pavement. I bought the Sun because I just couldn't bear the thought of ever falling off a bike again! It [my recovery] was one month of hell on wheels, with both arms splinted, being dependent upon the goodwill of my sister/bro-in-law to take care of me as long as I wasn't able to take care of myself. I I gave up totally on 2-wheeled bikes.couldn't brush, i couldn't wipe, i couldn't bathe myself, I was just a mess for over a month, until the casts came off and my arms regained some of their motion. So one can understand why I gave up totally on 2-wheeled bikes.

But enough about me- the Sun Trike is a semi-recumbent design, where the legs/feet are less than 90 degrees perpendicular to the pavement, an easy relaxed riding posture. The Sun features an adjustable rake seat backrest and one can slide the well-padded gel seatbottom back and forth over a foot to find the proper leg stride adjustment. The Sun comes in either a magenta-ish red or an electric blue paint job. By the luck of the draw I got the blue one. For not having any suspension besides relatively fat tires, it rode surprisingly well over the pockmarked and grainy country roads where I live. But one quickly learns to gauge the road's flatness, for dips and bumps are accentuated on this trike, which due to the narrow wheel track feels a lot like being pushed on a wheelchair awfully fast for comfort. Single-wheel dips or bumps make one feel one is about to be flipped to the left or right side unless one is going less than 5 miles per hour. This trike is happiest on new smooth high-quality pavement, but at least it can handle country roads with some caution on the rider's part.

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!
 

Friday, October 22, 2010

A public service for bicyclers wishing to know more about electric hybrid bikes

Hello again-
long time no here, so to speak.

Life kept me from these pages for 4 years but I am back again on a mission from the God of my latest perseveration, that of Electric Hybrid Bicycles.

In order to battle the bulge, to downsize the middle-age-spread into a more manageable size, I had to get back into physical exertion after a 4 year absence from the realm of fitness. Since I no longer live anywhere near civilization with public or private swimming pools, and my arthritic joints no longer allow the pounding upon pavement, bicycling is the only outdoor exercise I can still swing without collapsing in agony.
I have long enjoyed non-motorized transport, and have had a variety of 'bent and upright bikes. I have settled for the past few years on a Giant Suede GX "crank-forward" bike which neatly splits the difference between a semi-recumbent and and traditional upright bicycle, with the pedal crank several inches forward of the seat post. This particular bike has a [relatively] large comfy seat, a cushy seatpost suspension as well as a front suspension fork, to iron out the rough country roads around where I live. Unfortunately, my expanding aged posterior mean I need a little assistance on some of the longer hills, as I cannot continue just standing on the pedals and brute-forcing my way up them- the last time I tried, the chain broke and I fell down hard upon the handlebars, greensticking a few ribs. Ouch. So I started thinking about some electrical assistance with uphill propulsion and came upon various electrified bikes on the web, in various configurations, and finally settled upon a regular upright that would let me stand on the pedals when the battery petered-out. I went to my local [in the next county] bike store and saw a screaming deal [40% discount] on a closed-out Giant Twist Freedom DX hybrid bike in extra-large framesize, so I simply had to take it out on a test ride. The Twist has low-rolling-resistance tires whose harshness was partially ameliorated by a 60+ pound bicycle weight as well as a very cushy front suspension fork and seat suspension post [with a little more stiction than is comfortable but is still better than nothing]. The Twist has a 250-watt variable output brushless motor on the front wheel hub, in direct drive mode. This motor emits very little noise unless one is trying to climb a hill in top gear, at which point it whines in protest. The rider would be wise to be kind to this valiant "little-engine-that-could" by using the lower gears on the hills. On the handlebars is a red LED powermeter with selectable econ-normal-sport pedal assistance modes, each adding approx. 20% more boost, as well as an L or R switch for each battery, the pair of which rests aside the back tire, for a lower center of gravity. Each battery is a $300 5-pound gray brick, with a claimed recharging capacity of 600 cycles. This model has twin batteries, each with a claimed range in excess of 35 miles, or 75 miles for the pair. Per Giant's disclaimer in the owner's manual, this published range is dependent on how heavy/bulky the rider is as well as how hilly the routes are to be ridden. Butt [mispelling intentional] my 6'3" & 200 pound tuckas is heavier than what this bicycle was prepared to schlepp around, for when I did an informal 20 mile ride on the hills and dales of my corner of Hooterville, I found that this drained the battery from 5 lit LEDS down to 1 & 1/2 - extrapolating from this, I estimate a realistic range of 25 miles per battery charge, fully using the lower gears on the hills. The batteries take an average of 5 hours to recharge, each. A competing but far more expensive bike, the Schwinn Tailwind, uses a Toshiba battery system which allows for 1/2-hour recharges. The power selector has only a modestly perceptible difference in boost between its 3 settings. In anycase, thank God the Twist has twin batteries, one for each way of the trip into town- otherwise, pedaling this 60-pound tank for 20+ hilly miles [sans assist] is real work.
The Twist doesn't allow use of the 8th gear of its superbly smooth Shimano internal hub tranny, on any but the flats, and will only provide supplemental propulsion up to 15 miles per hour, which is insufficient- I kept running out of assistance, so it needs to push until 20 mph- but I realize this is a design consideration for battery life. Maybe if I lived in town [really just a wide spot on the road] on the flats I'd get better mileage. Maybe if I were Lance Armstrong I'd be getting better mileage but then again If I were made like him I wouldn't need the electric assist in the first place.
But I am glad I have this bike, as it puts a smile on my face when I go tooling 'round the neighborhood with it. I can outrun even the most fleet bad barking dogs and their yahoo owners. It is a benefit to be able to climb the steep hills between me and civilization, which is largely impossible for me to do with the Giant Suede GX- if only it had a motor. I like having a cutting-edge product, especially at a bargain, as I would never have considered this [otherwise] pricey item otherwise. Giant [the firm] seems bullish on this bike, having built a huge new factory for international distribution and sales. As for what I like and dislike about it:

*I wish it were crank-forward like my Suede GX;
*I wish it had a less-sticky suspension seat post;
*I wish it would push past 15 miles per hour;
*It really needs to come standard with a more steatopiguous-booty-friendly seat;
*I wish it had the quick-charging Toshiba battery setup;
*I believe it could benefit from more juice than 250 watts, at least in the form of a boost button;
*I wish it weren't so damned heavy! This tank of a bike weighs over 60 lbs! Lifting it onto the bike carrier is a chore.

All in all, I recommend this bike to anybody with cutting-edge interests and deep pockets with lots of metal burning a hole in 'em, or to the lucky fella who finds one discounted as I did.

Labels:

Saturday, April 01, 2006

Ladies and Gentlemen- or maybe I should say "hey, people" ;+)

What you see in the pic is the God's Honest Truth- I know all you ER medicos have seen things like this from time to time- I ain't puttin' you on here! However, since this [belatedly] is April Fools' time, the following little articles are appropriate, I'd say-
.
.
In 1977, the British newspaper The Guardian published a special seven-page supplement in honor of the 10th anniversary of San Serriffe, a small republic located in the Indian Ocean consisting of several semicolon-shaped islands.
A series of articles affectionately described the geography and culture of this obscure nation. Its two main islands were named Upper Caisse and Lower Caisse. Its capital was Bodoni, and its leader was General Pica.
The Guardian's phones rang all day as readers sought more information about the idyllic holiday spot. Few noticed that everything about the island was named after printer's terminology.
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/In 1957, the BBC news show Panorama announced that thanks to a mild winter and the virtual elimination of the dreaded spaghetti weevil, Swiss farmers were enjoying a bumper spaghetti crop.
It accompanied this announcement with footage of Swiss peasants pulling strands of spaghetti down from trees.
Huge numbers of viewers were taken in, and many called up wanting to know how they could grow spaghetti trees. To this question, the BBC diplomatically replied that they should "place a sprig of spaghetti in a tin of tomato sauce and hope for the best."
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
In the earlier part of the Twentieth Century, in the County of Caithness
in the north of Scotland, great excitement arose when a pot (or part thereof)
was discovered, apparently stemming from the Roman occupation of Britain. It
was exciting because there was no archaeological evidence up to that point of
the Romans having been that far north. The local newspaper, The Caithness
Courier, gave prominence to the find, and quoted in full the inscription on
the artifact. It was ITI SAPIS SPOTANDA BIGO NE.*
The Courier never lived down its naivete.
.......................................................................................................................................
*It Is A Pi$$pot And A Big One
.......................................................................................................................................
Anybody here or out there remember the wonderful Cliff Robertson Oscar-winner "Charly"? [based on Daniel Keyes' "Flowers for Algernon" novel]? This film was about a mentally retarded adult man who aspired to be smarter, and who lucked-into becoming a test subject for an experimental brain operation designed to boost intelligence. Anyways, this man got the operation and soon was doing a "*Pi$$pot"- type of indefinite-letter-parsing wordplay on a blackboard, thusly-
"it that is is it that is not is not is that it it is"
He did this to challenge the smarts of his teacher and to prove that he had indeed become a smarter man- by showing that the addition of proper punctuation could transform the aforementioned gibberish, into-
"It that is, is. It that is not, is not. Is that it? It is."
.......................................................................................................................................
Here is another brain-tickler for anybody who happens to be in this remote corner of blogland-
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...
From The Times:
"A young girl, who was blown out to sea on a set of inflatable teeth, was
rescued by a man on an inflatable lobster. A coastguard spokesman
commented: 'This sort of thing is all too common these days.'"
.
Now, anybody out there who can figure that one out, my hat's off to you.

Friday, March 31, 2006

Now and Then


Many music lovers with collections of non-CD recordings [78 rpm 10 & 12" recordings, 45 rpm 7" & 12", 10" & 12" lp, cassettes, open-reel tapes] which have been "loved" to death- with distracting noise and distortion overpowering the pure music within, long have found their options for restoring their recordings to be either expensive [professional treatment with CEDAR or NONOISE, trademarks of Cambridge Audio, ltd- and Sonic Solutions, Inc.] or just putting-up with the noise- I am here to try to help.
My name is Bruce, I am a collector of recorded music and a fellow music lover- what follows is a long story, so patience, please...
[Since I am "not Spock", I want you to see my disguise, as a hospital worker who has more fun as a blond:+) ]
.
For many years BC [before computers] I suffered like a dog chained in the yard with a bunch of firecrackers popping all around] whenever I listened to my favorite records- not even 78's then but ordinary lp's and 45rpm singles- plagued with loud clicks and pops [impulse noises, in the parlance of audio folk], and intrusive hiss on cassettes, especially those recorded with improper bias and Dolby level. At this time [the 70's and early 80's] I knew nothing about professional tools for single-ended noise reduction [Packburn #323A, manual editing block] nor had I seen the consumer equipment available then [Burwin TNE7000A Transient Noise Eliminator, KLH Noise Filter, et al] until 1983, when the local hifi place got these miracle boxes in their shop for folk like me to ooh and ah over- at least in theory, since there was precious little demonstration going on- these 2 boxes cost $500 EACH in 1983 dollars, which was more moolah than my 23-year-old self had seen up to that point, but I finally was able to persuade the store owner to put on a record and demonstrate to this "waste of his expensive time" music lover what good analog noise reduction tools could do to make phonograph-listening a more aesthetically pleasing experience for me, provided I could "pull myself up by my own bootstraps" and get some $$$ and buy this stuff from him sometime soon [HAH!]- the turntable was a Denon with their moving-coil cartridge, a pair of large Mirage speakers, a Mobile Fidelity half-speed remastered lp playing some bombastic classical piece with bass drum and low brasses blatting away in reverberant sonority but with an overlay of hiss and crackle- Mr. Sound Man switched the noise reduction in, and to my inexperienced amazement, all the surface noise just disappeared [at the time, there was too much traffic noise outside to really hear the quiet sounds of the record, otherwise I would have noticed that with the crackle and hiss gone, record rumble really becomes intrusive, even on top equipment with top-quality pressings] and from that time [until I started being able to "do it myself" in 1995 with the advent of consumer-level digital audio tools such as Wave for Windows and a 486 PC with 16 megs of RAM - those were the days- and a newly-purchased Sony DAT recorder] I became even more obsessed with getting the crackles out, and searched pawnshops and used equipment places until I was able to find a working old SAE5000A and a KLH noise filter- I was never able to find a working used Burwin TNE7000 which was really the Lincoln of declickers then [the Packburn #323A was the Rolls-Royce of Single-Ended Noise Reduction]- and then I set to work making "quality" cassette copies of my crackly old flat friends run-through these 2 filter boxes, expecting miracles like I remembered hearing in that magical "rich-person's" audio heaven I'd been in 5 years before- and getting... noise and distortion! [ just altered in timbre and volume]. If I spoke Japanese [like my mother], I woulda sputtered, "NAN DESKA! Honto Deska?!" [roughly, "What is This!" "Is This True?!"] My jaw sorta dropped and I became a little depressed and even paranoid ["I was ripped-off! This can't be the real stuff!"] Alas, I heard other examples of what this primitive equipment could NOT do- through headphones at least, a person with average hearing acuity could hear "thuds" replacing sharp clicks, and POP!s remained as explosive as before, with nary a dulling of their volume. The Hiss filter, OTOH, turned hissy discs and cassettes into swishy [no jokes, please] discs and cassettes- when I tried to get rid-of the swish, the music was damped-down into pillow-stifled dullness, making the platter rumble that much more obvious. Sooooo... my search for audio panacea renewed itself with vigor, and it wasn't until I read an article in a 1988 issue of High Fidelity magazine, about the then revolutionary Sonic Solutions NONOISE system, which was reviewed in remastered recordings of Leadbelly and The Blue Mountain Boys, on RCA's Heritage label- in which David Ranada explained how the system worked, [namely, on a modified Macintosh computer with expensive daughterboard modifications, to the tune of $40,000] and I became obsessed with getting my own similar system, someday- when either 1] "I jerked myself up by my own bootstraps and got rich" or 2] and far more likely, the stuff would come down in price in some diluted form and I could go into hock and beg, borrow and buy it. So I reluctantly was dragged kicking and screaming into the computer age- up to then I had never used a computer nor knew anything about the temperamental beasts with their sputtering daisy wheel printers and cackling hard drives that stored about a spoonful of data- but I reluctantly sought-out information on how to use the infernal machines to accomplish a dull imitation of what I had read in that hifi rag in 1989. I went to Tower Records and Silver Platters in search of CDs treated with NoNoise [and a bit later, CEDAR, which stands for Computer Enhanced Digital Audio Restoration], and YES! Found them in various Columbia [now Sony] and RCA Bluebird CDs of Jazz artists such as "Fatha" Earl Hines and Bix Beiderbecke and Louis Armstrong, et al- I took these jewels home in their long boxes [anybody remember those?] and put 'em on the box and heard... noise and distortion!!! [with due respect to Sonic Systems and CEDAR ltd.]- I heard a fancier version of what I experienced with the inexpensive consumer noise filters I'd gotten a while before- silenced crackles but only muffled pops on the CEDAR, along with swishy treble noise aliasing- and muffled crackle [but the loud pops were gone] and dulled trebles [or intrusive remnant hiss] on the Nonoise-treated CDs- along with doses of chopped-up brass [NoNoise]- I realized years later that these faults were operator shortcomings, that both systems are capable of [relatively] clean reduction of surface noise but certainly not totally transparent noise elimination. I eventually was able to get a CEDAR X-series Declicker off of Ebay, for a substantial discount, because the original owner obtained an AudioCube system which was an upgrade. Anyways, [based on what I had heard on CDs treated with CEDAR] I eagerly put an lp on the platter [I'd finally found a used Denon turntable with moving coil cartridge I'd heard years ago in that magical mercenary hifi audio salon] I heard- you guessed it- Noise and Distortion! My guess is that the algorithm CEDAR uses has an easier time declicking 78s than it does lp's with their greater treble energy- the discrete clicks as well as the background crackle were GONE[!] with no defect, when I had a 78 playing- but when I put on a direct-to-disc lp of Les Brown and his Band of Renown, the brasses degraded to the sound of worn cloth ripping. So I turned the click sensitivity control back to 8 o'clock, and the clicks returned but were reduced in number, and the cloth trumpets regained their brassy blattiness. So again I searched for a better way- and found [to my pleasant surprise!] an economical software set by a company in Germany called Virtos GMBH- their program is called Virtos Noise Wizard Noise Reduction Tools, it is available as a try-before-you-buy shareware program at www.hitsquad.com, aka Shareware Music Machine. The particular tool I use most often, is their Declicker/Decrackler, I have found to perform better than my CEDAR on lp's, [It doesn't chop-up the brasses as badly but passes slightly more crackle on most 78rpm material]. So, I use them both in a complementary manner. [The reader will notice that each program I talk about has strong points and weak points, which I will discuss in more detail later]
The best general noise [static hiss and roar] supressor I have found, is Sound Laundry [also available at hitsquad.com ] - it allows me to hear what I am taking out [just like Virtos Noise Reduction tools] but I can get a superior amount of rumble and other low-frequency grunge removed with this particular tool. For spot-cleaning and precision cut-and-paste edits, I've had very good luck with Sonic Foundry's [now also Sony] Sound Forge wave editor, with DX plug-ins for noise reduction which allow for cut-less click elimination by filling in the space where a loud click or pop was, with an extrapolation of the waveform a millisecond or so in front-of and behind. Pristine Sounds 2000 has a unique rumble-reduction filter which doesn't kill bass instruments and seems to allow for bass channel separation as well, and it works on MONO [single-channel with no stereo channel differential noise cancellation going-on!] materials also! In addition, there is a decently-priced product from MAGIX called Audio Cleaning Lab 10, which has a feature that is available elsewhere only as a CEDAR product which cost as much as a house- their Spectral Cleaning utility allows the user to visualize any noise as a 2-dimensional image in frequency space and time, and you just draw around the noise [a coughing classical music hater, a ringing phone, a honking car horn outside, etc.] and eliminate it! Granted, Pristine Sounds also has this feature but MAGIX was the first affordable product to also use frequency extrapolation/substitution for the edited noise, so you don't hear as much of a "hole" in the music at the edit point, and the visual spectral workspace is much larger and more detailed in the MAGIX product compared with Pristine Sounds. I also use DCART Millenium [well-priced and available as shareware, with powerful filters- originally developed to restore Edison Diamond Discs] as well as a revised DartProXP, which has a greatly improved declicker and denoiser compared with the first version I got way back in 1995.

One thing I want all readers here to see- what proper restoration involves is not simply removal of noise, but "tailored" alteration of sound- it's not enough to remove hiss and crackle, there is groove roar and rumble ready to take the place of the rice crispies noise- and at each step in the process, it is possible to miscalculate and take out too much sound- so most audio restoration folk leave in a trace amount [some leave in much more than that] of broadband noise which serves as a sort-of "acoustic dither" that fills-in the missing trebles in some old 78rpm discs. I do this but I also use a modified noise gate to subtly modulate the remnant noise so it is not as obtrusive in quiet sections of music. Custom EQ is usually indicated, to compensate for the telephonic coloration in many older disc recordings, as well as to give the impression of clearer trebles. Sonic excitation [heterodyning and/or digital spectral synthesis] can also revitalize the sound of older or poorly-made records, recreating treble and bass energy which are MIA on many old acoustically-recorded 78's [the kind where the musicians huddled around the mouth of a huge horn and shouted into it, vibrating a needle cutting an undulating groove into a spinning wax disc].
[BTW, Virtos Noise Reduction Tools also has a good Spectral Enhancer tool, which is useful in this type of muffled recording]
Also note, that not every recording can be [really] restored, in terms of "making a silk purse out a sow's ear"- sometimes one is lucky just to get a cloth handbag out of it! The music-lover sometimes is left with only their imagination, to render listenable some old discs just beyond the pale.

The gist of my ramble, is that "it takes a village" [sorry, Hillary:+)] of software to properly restore most noisy audio recordings, that no one particular piece of hardware and software can do it all by itself, to my satisfaction. It also takes superior monitoring equipment to properly hear what you are doing- I made plenty of coasters [crappy CDs] because the rotten headphones I'd been monitoring with obscured too much treble for me to hear that I'd been leaving in swishy "star wars noise" [aka "Noise Reduction Aliasing"] and/or taking out too much treble, making for dull and lifeless recordings. So on that end, I heartily recommend Sennheiser headphones such as the precision 580- or for those with bluer blood than I, the 600s, which are about as revealing and neutral a headphone one can find.

For folk who cannot be bothered with the exacting details ["quick and dirty" restoration results in "quickly listened-to and forgotten" and "dirty rotten shame it was a half-&$$ed job" results- I will guide you step-by-step, if you wish to give it a try], I am available to do the job for you, for a bargain rate, if you are patient- I am only one person, me, myself and I;+)- and I can do only one job at a time, and since I refuse to do "quick and dirty [see above explanation], a quality restoration will take as much time as it takes for little ol' me to do it. I may charge either per the job or per the hour, depending on my estimation of a project's exigencies.

Post your comments and requests, and I promise [though I can't guarantee] that I will try to answer every single person who bothers to read this blog and write to me with questions.

I thank you all sincerely, for taking time out of your busy day to read me:+) I never thought I could do any of this "web stuff" and am glad Blogger.com was created, so that even luddites like me could spout boilerplate on the web, and try to help a little corner of humanity.
Something new I found below, is a great alternative to Ebay-
I don't know about you, but I find Ebay to be a somewhat complicated affair for sellers and not much better for buyers. Ebid seems to be simpler to use. Give it time, it will grow...